Who Had More Ethics, Democrats or Republicans?

July 12, 2020 Stan

Luckily, all of my five closest neighbors are true Americans who believe in the Constitution, the United States and the freedoms and liberties we stand for – thus, they are all Republicans or Libertarians leaning right (I am one of the latter). Unfortunately, speaking out and exercising your right to free speech isn’t so easy in Southern California. My neighbors have had political signs for local Republican politicians stolen off their property or vandalized. I’ve had signs stolen, stakes broken and signs knocked over – sometimes early in the morning, sometimes after dark.

I assume the signs brought down in the morning are from liberal-socialists walking their dogs in the morning, and the signs taken down at night done by spiteful leftists who won’t afford me the same opportunity to involve myself in the political process as they demand I afford them. I am tired of the hypocrisy, tired of being called a racist (I am not). Turns out this is not just a left-coast thing, it’s happening also on the East Coast, in the Boston Area where people are tearing down campaign signs for Donald trump.

Who is the left trying to fool? Demanding politically correct talk, demanding that I adjust my speech to their approved narrative – folks, that isn’t free speech, that’s coercion and if I was to speak out of turn at the office, I could lose my job, but they can spew hate speech for Donald Trump across the land, at our schools, agencies, Universities, corporations, even at Starbucks. Why do we have a double-standard, and how is this acceptable – how does this fit into our rights as citizens – how come our ethics are challenged by those who disagree?

Now then, I take issue at all this and want to switch gears and start asking questions of the other side:

Is It Unethical To Skip Government Ethics Classes.

There was an interesting story in the Washington Times titled; “No Evidence that Hillary or Aides Took Ethics Training,”

“The RNC had sued to get a look at the records for Mrs. Clinton and nine of her top staffers, including many who have shifted over to work on her presidential campaign. Of those, only three had records showing they completed the training. The revelation came as Mrs. Clinton and her team face deeper questions about whether she used the department to benefit the Clinton Foundation, an international charity run by her family and close friends,” and it turns out that; “Six Clinton confidantes at the State Department who lack any record of taking the required ethics training were Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Anne Marie Slaughter, Caitlin Klevorick, Jake Sullivan and Kris Bladerston.”

Were these employees told not to take the required training courses or sign that they had just in case the issue came up later? If so, there is a conspiracy, if not, how is it that these employees, including Hillary Clinton herself were exempt? Did they purposely miss those classes so they could say that; “We didn’t know what we were doing was illegal.” And of course, the ethics administrator supposedly felt intimidated for their job to push the issue? Again, no “Equality” when it comes to Hillary, she is a white woman above the law, just ask her?

To hell with Hillary’s Hypocrisy – I am sick to my stomach over this BS. Presidential Material – Surely, you jest.